Evaluating NFL Offenses using Expected Points

By: Robert Simpson

In the article, “Evaluating NFL Defenses using Expected Points,” the notion of Expected Points Added per Drive (EPA/D)  is explained, demonstrating how assessing the difference between starting Expected Points (EP) and ending EP on a particular drive can measure a team’s defensive success. If you have not read this article, it is highly recommended to understand the principles discussed in this article, and can be found here.

Applying Expected Points to Offense

Once one understands how to evaluate defensive performance based on Expected Points Added per Drive, it is easy to apply this concept conversely to create an offensive measurement. Like its defensive counterpart, the offensive metric is derived from taking the ending EP and subtracting the starting EP. The only difference here is that the higher the measurement, the better the offense. Offensive EPA/D measures how many Expected Points an offense added per drive, on average, over the course of the 2018 NFL season.

Ranking NFL Offenses

The table below ranks NFL offenses for the 2018 season based on EPA/D and juxtaposes this ranking with three traditional metrics for measuring offensive success: yards per game, points per game, and turnovers.

Team EPA/D Rank EPA/D YPG Rank PPG Rank TO Rank
Kansas City Chiefs 1 1.65 1 1 T-7
New Orleans Saints 2 1.39 8 3 T-3
Los Angeles Rams 3 1.29 2 2 T-11
Atlanta Falcons 4 0.94 6 10 T-7
Indianapolis Colts 5 0.94 7 5 T-22
Pittsburgh Steelers 6 0.933 4 T-6 26
Los Angeles Chargers 7 0.92 11 T-6 T-11
New England Patriots 8 0.92 5 4 T-7
Tampa Bay Buccaneers 9 0.83 3 12 32
Carolina Panthers 10 0.81 10 T-14 19
Seattle Seahawks 11 0.75 18 T-6 1
Houston Texans 12 0.71 15 11 T-3
Philadelphia Eagles 13 0.69 14 18 T-20
Green Bay Packers 14 0.69 12 T-14 2
Baltimore Ravens 15 0.51 9 13 T-16
New York Giants 16 0.48 17 16 T-11
Chicago Bears 17 0.45 21 9 T-22
Dallas Cowboys 18 0.44 22 22 T-5
Cincinnati Bengals 19 0.39 26 17 T-5
Denver Broncos 20 0.34 19 24 18
Cleveland Browns 21 0.33 13 20 T-22
Detroit Lions 22 0.32 24 25 T-11
San Francisco 49ers 23 0.25 16 21 T-30
Minnesota Vikings 24 0.20 20 19 T-17
Tennessee Titans 25 0.14 25 27 T-7
Oakland Raiders 26 0.11 23 28 T-22
Washington Redskins 27 0.10 28 29 T-11
Miami Dolphins 28 -0.11 31 26 T-21
New York Jets 29 -0.23 29 23 29
Jacksonville Jaguars 30 -0.30 27 31 28
Buffalo Bills 31 -0.38 30 30 T-30
Arizona Cardinals 32 -0.699 32 32 27

 

One team that stands out in these rankings is the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. In terms of yards per game, the Bucs had a prolific offense, third best in the NFL. However, they struggled to put as many points on the board as they should have because of their plethora of turnovers.

Tampa Bay turned the ball over a league-worst 35 times over the course of the regular season, just under one turnover every five drives. That abysmal turnover rate was largely due to the highly volatile play of quarterback Ryan Fitzpatrick and the NFL’s turnover leader since 2017, Jameis Winston (tied with Kirk Cousins and Derek Carr). Despite this terrible turnover rate, the Bucs still ranked No. 9 in offensive EPA/D. It will be interesting to see if this offense can reduce its mistakes and reach greater heights under new head coach Bruce Arians.

At first glance, a No. 4 overall ranking for the Atlanta Falcons seems too high, as they sit at No. 6, 10, and tied for 7th in yards, points, and turnovers, respectively. A deeper look at the numbers reveals that the Falcons ranked tied for last in the NFL in both starting expected points and offensive drives. On average, Atlanta started each offensive drive from its own 26-yard line and had 1.01 starting expected points. In contrast, the Saints started their offensive drives on average from their own 31-yard line, the league’s best mark, while touting 1.33 starting expected points. This amounts to a deficit of .32 expected points per drive, or 54 points over the course of the season. That 54-point differential would move the Falcons from No. 10 in points to No. 4.

The NFL average amount of offensive drives across the 2018 season was approximately 179, while Atlanta only had 168. Adding their 1.0 average starting expected points to their .94 offensive EPA/D and multiplying the result by these 11 missed drives, the Falcons missed out on more than 21 points on the season by not having these opportunities. This poor starting field position and low number of drives is mostly due to Atlanta’s subpar, injury-riddled defense. Using the defensive EPA/D ranking, its defense was the second worst in the NFL.

Conclusion

A variety of factors contribute to a team’s offensive success, from the performance of the quarterback to the ability of individual linemen, but the effect of field position cannot be understated. Using offensive EPA/D distinguishes truly elite offenses from those who have unproportionally benefitted from the field position provided by their defense and special teams. Offensive EPA/D also accentuates the importance of avoiding turnovers and paints a better picture of offensive performance as a whole. 

 

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: